LOT 9 Vtg 1940s 1950s 1960s Baby Toddler Dress Playsuit Romper SEWING PATTERNS for Sale

On eBay Now...

LOT 9 Vtg 1940s 1950s 1960s Baby Toddler Dress Playsuit Romper SEWING PATTERNS For Sale

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

LOT 9 Vtg 1940s 1950s 1960s Baby Toddler Dress Playsuit Romper SEWING PATTERNS:
$15.00

As with many vintage patterns, condition varies, especially with worn, stained, marked, taped, split, or tattered envelopes. All patterns havebeen checked for completeness of pieces and instructions.

This lot of 9 vintage children’s sewing patterns includes

Advance 5752 Celeste designer dress in size ½ (19 chest and waist), complete though some notched and perforated pieces are crumpled and wrinkled;

Butterick 3309 nightgown and pajamas in size 2 (21 chest, 20 waist, 22 hip) complete with all notched and perforated pieces;

Butterick 4049 dress in size 1 (20 chest, 19 ½ waist) trimmed/cut and complete;

1943 copyright DuBarry 5826 dress in size 2 (21 chest, 20 waist) complete with all notched and perforated pieces;

1941 copyright McCall 878 smocked dress in size 6 months (19 chest and waist) trimmed/cut and complete with used transfer;

1955 copyright McCall’s 3301 jumper dress in size 2 (21 chest and 20 waist) trimmed/cut and complete;

Simplicity 1198 coverall and hat in size 1 (20 chest and 19 ½ waist) notched/perforated and mostly complete (missing View 1 neck facing piece);

1945 copyright Simplicity 1340 playsuit and jacket in size 1 (20 chest and 19 ½ waist) notched/perforated and mostly complete (missing the bib piece);

1971 copyright Simplicity 9290 jumpsuit and bubble suit in size ½ (19 chest and waist) trimmed/cut and complete.

U.S. buyer pays$5.20 first class package shipping with tracking.International buyer pays for 12 ounce package with tracking/customs number.No returns as is standard for patternsunless I\'ve made a mistake in checking the completeness.